PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJUL vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TJUL vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TJUL vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
-0.77%6.55%8.18%3.05%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%1.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


TJUL

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TJUL vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TJUL vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL
TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TJULISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.35

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.86

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.61

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.75

6.68

+0.07

TJUL vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TJULISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.35

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

-0.04

+1.49

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and ISWN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TJUL vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TJULISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-32.35%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-9.63%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-7.11%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-16.57%

+16.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

2.32%

-1.59%

Volatility

TJUL vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 1.38%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TJULISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

6.13%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

8.60%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

11.81%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.36%

11.47%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

11.40%

-7.04%