TJUL vs. COMT
TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. TJUL is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.57% vs 33.20% for COMT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
TJUL vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
TJUL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
TJUL vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 | 2.47% | 6.55% | 8.18% | 3.09% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TJUL and COMT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023 | 0.03 |
The correlation between TJUL and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TJUL vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
TJUL
COMT
TJUL vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TJUL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.90 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 6.35 | +6.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TJUL vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TJUL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -51.89% | +47.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -17.57% | +15.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.61% | -17.57% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -11.28% | +11.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -23.95% | +23.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 5.24% | -4.79% |
Volatility
TJUL vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) is 0.68%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that TJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TJUL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 5.91% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 19.67% | -17.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 21.54% | -18.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 21.20% | -17.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 18.85% | -14.65% |
TJUL vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
TJUL vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TJUL and COMT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to TJUL (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 33.20% vs 5.57% for TJUL. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 33.20% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJUL.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.
TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 0.48% for COMT.
TJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TJUL and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer