TJUL vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJUL returned 5.54% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

TJUL vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUL achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

TJUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUL vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	2.07%	6.55%	8.18%	5.20%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUL and BAMU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

TJUL vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUL

TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 62
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUL vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TJUL	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	5.01	-3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	8.84	-6.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.43	-1.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	24.72	-22.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	97.90	-85.60

TJUL vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUL and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TJUL vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUL drawdown since its inception was -4.61%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUL and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUL	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-0.36%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.08%	-0.12%	-1.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-0.02%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.03%	+0.42%

Volatility

TJUL vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that TJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUL	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.09%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.23%	0.40%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85%	0.58%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.24%	0.87%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.24%	0.87%	+3.37%

TJUL vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUL vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

TJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUL and BAMU in my portfolio?

TJUL and BAMU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUL or BAMU?

TJUL has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUL dropped -4.61% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, TJUL or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, TJUL leads with 5.54% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, TJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUL or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, TJUL has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUL or BAMU?

TJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUL or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for TJUL.

What is the main difference between TJUL and BAMU?

TJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJUL and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.