PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJAN vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJAN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJAN achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 80.79% return.


TJAN

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.25%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.81%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-2.44%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
80.79%
6M
73.97%
1Y
82.92%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
22.87%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJAN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TJAN and BNO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

-0.14

The correlation between TJAN and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJAN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJAN
TJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJAN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TJANBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.34

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

4.66

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.86

8.73

+11.13

TJAN vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJAN and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TJANBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.00

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.13

+1.46

Drawdowns

TJAN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJAN and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJANBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-87.06%

+82.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-17.87%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-14.85%

+14.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-40.16%

+39.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

9.53%

-9.13%

Volatility

TJAN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) is 0.47%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that TJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJANBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

11.71%

-11.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

36.33%

-34.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

41.63%

-38.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

35.41%

-31.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

36.69%

-32.28%

TJAN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJAN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither TJAN nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TJAN and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to TJAN (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJAN dropped -4.83% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 82.92% vs 7.84% for TJAN. On fees, TJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 82.92% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

TJAN and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJAN and 0.90% for BNO.

TJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJAN and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer