TIPZ vs. ICVT
TIPZ (PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF) and ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIPZ returned 2.51%/yr vs 14.10%/yr for ICVT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TIPZ has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 2.51%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.10% annualized return.
TIPZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
ICVT
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 26.51%
- 6M
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 44.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIPZ PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF | 2.79% | 5.87% | 1.52% | 3.37% | -12.67% | 5.48% | 10.98% | 8.64% | -1.65% | 3.12% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 26.51% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -0.27% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPZ and ICVT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015 | 0.07 |
The correlation between TIPZ and ICVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPZ vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank
TIPZ
ICVT
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIPZ | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 3.12 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 4.03 | -2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.55 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 5.94 | -3.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 21.71 | -14.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIPZ | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.12 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.62 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.91 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.79 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and ICVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPZ | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.77% | -33.25% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.18% | -7.55% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | -11.22% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | -29.95% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.77% | -33.25% | +17.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | 0.00% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -9.50% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 2.07% | -1.37% |
Volatility
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) is 0.97%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that TIPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPZ | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 5.38% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 11.67% | -8.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 14.32% | -10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 13.24% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 15.50% | -9.66% |
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TIPZ and ICVT have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPZ vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison
TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than ICVT's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.28% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
TIPZ PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF | 5.10% | 4.74% | 4.44% | 4.69% | 7.14% | 4.41% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 2.23% | 1.70% | 1.06% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPZ and ICVT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICVT has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to TIPZ (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs ICVT's -33.25%.
On 10-year performance, ICVT leads with 14.10% vs 2.51% for TIPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, TIPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 14.10% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIPZ and ICVT have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
TIPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.10%, compared with 1.28% for ICVT.
TIPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ICVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while ICVT tracks Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIPZ and ICVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer