PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPZ vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TIPZ has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 2.51%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.10% annualized return.


TIPZ

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
2.79%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
2.51%

ICVT

1D
1.04%
1M
9.19%
YTD
26.51%
6M
26.15%
1Y
44.47%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
14.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
2.79%5.87%1.52%3.37%-12.67%5.48%10.98%8.64%-1.65%3.12%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
26.51%18.10%10.61%15.35%-20.66%-0.66%61.01%21.76%-0.27%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPZ and ICVT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.07

The correlation between TIPZ and ICVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPZ vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIPZICVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

3.12

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

4.03

-2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.55

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

5.94

-3.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

21.71

-14.80

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPZ and ICVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIPZICVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

3.12

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.62

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.91

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.79

-0.26

Drawdowns

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and ICVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPZICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-33.25%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-7.55%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-11.22%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

-29.95%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.77%

-33.25%

+17.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-9.50%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.07%

-1.37%

Volatility

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) is 0.97%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that TIPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPZICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

5.38%

-4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

11.67%

-8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

14.32%

-10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

13.24%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

15.50%

-9.66%

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TIPZ and ICVT have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPZ vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than ICVT's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.28%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.10%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPZ and ICVT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICVT has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to TIPZ (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs ICVT's -33.25%.

On 10-year performance, ICVT leads with 14.10% vs 2.51% for TIPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, TIPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 14.10% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIPZ and ICVT have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

TIPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.10%, compared with 1.28% for ICVT.

TIPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ICVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while ICVT tracks Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares.

ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPZ and ICVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer