PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPZ vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPZ vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TIPZ has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.37%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


TIPZ

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.90%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.37%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPZ vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
1.90%5.87%1.52%3.37%-12.67%5.48%10.98%8.64%-1.65%3.12%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPZ and BIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009

-0.00

The correlation between TIPZ and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPZ vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPZ vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPZBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-171.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

87.16

-85.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

352.24

-350.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

2,793.11

-2,788.03

TIPZ vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPZ and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPZ vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPZBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-0.78%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-0.01%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-0.01%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

-0.09%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.77%

-0.21%

-15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

0.00%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-0.26%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.00%

+0.71%

Volatility

TIPZ vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that TIPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPZBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.07%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

0.14%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

0.20%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

0.26%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

0.26%

+5.59%

TIPZ vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPZ vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.14%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPZ and BIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIPZ has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, TIPZ leads with 2.37% vs 2.20% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TIPZ has performed better with a 2.37% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TIPZ.

TIPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 3.85% for BIL.

TIPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BIL is Government Bonds. TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TIPZ and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPZ and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer