TIPA vs. IBIC
TIPA (Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPA is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
TIPA vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPA achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.61% return.
TIPA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.40M | $906.78K | $527.01K | |
| $1.26K | $9.58K | $152.52K |
TIPA vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPA Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.84% | 0.52% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.61% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPA and IBIC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPA vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
TIPA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIC
TIPA vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 15.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 53.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPA vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPA drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum IBIC drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.90% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.02% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -0.10% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
TIPA vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60% | 0.91% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.60% | 1.55% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.60% | 1.55% | +0.05% |
TIPA vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TIPA and IBIC have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPA vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
TIPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
TIPA Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.29% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPA and IBIC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPA and IBIC have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.29% for TIPA.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares.
Find the right allocation for TIPA and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer