PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIP vs. GEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIP vs. GEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 44.12% return.


TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.53%

GEV

1D
3.74%
1M
-13.74%
YTD
44.12%
6M
40.23%
1Y
97.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.40%6.77%2.08%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
44.12%99.02%186.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP and GEV is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIP vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPGEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.82

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

11.27

-4.27

TIP vs. GEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the GEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP and GEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIP vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum GEV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and GEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPGEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-38.29%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-24.57%

+22.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-18.17%

+17.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-6.99%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

8.31%

-7.65%

Volatility

TIP vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.03%, while GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPGEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

13.17%

-12.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

34.45%

-32.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

49.09%

-45.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

53.62%

-47.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

53.62%

-47.88%

Dividends

TIP vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison

TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than GEV's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.16%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIP and GEV have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEV has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs GEV's -38.29%.

GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP and GEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer