PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TIP vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TIP vs. EEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L), while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.57%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for EEM. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TIP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.

Performance

TIP vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 2.57%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.

TIP

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
2.57%

EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF		1.54%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP and EEM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2003

-0.05

The correlation between TIP and EEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with TIP:
TIP vs. SCHPTIP vs. VTIPTIP vs. SGOVTIP vs. STIPTIP vs. FIPDXTIP vs. BNDTIP vs. IEF
Often compared with EEM:
EEM vs. VWOEEM vs. SPYEEM vs. IEMGEEM vs. IS3N.DEEEM vs. VXUSEEM vs. EEMSEEM vs. SPEM

Return for Risk

TIP vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TIPEEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.81

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

3.62

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.15

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

15.99

-8.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIP vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TIPEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.81

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.37

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.38

+0.19

Drawdowns

TIP vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and EEM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TIPEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-66.43%

+51.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-13.52%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

-17.29%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

-37.71%

+23.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

-39.82%

+25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.24%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-16.02%

+12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

3.50%

-2.84%

Volatility

TIP vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 0.89%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TIPEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

8.52%

-7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

17.42%

-15.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

19.97%

-16.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

18.91%

-12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

20.50%

-14.76%

TIP vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIP vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than EEM's 1.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF		3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

TIP and EEM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to TIP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.93% vs 2.57% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.

TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. TIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L), while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TIP and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer