PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIP vs. DBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIP vs. DBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed DBA with an annualized return of 2.34%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.14% annualized return.


TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.34%

DBA

1D
0.22%
1M
5.59%
6M
7.72%
YTD
8.82%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
4.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.00%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
8.82%-0.56%33.45%7.64%2.53%22.37%-2.54%-0.71%-8.74%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP and DBA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2007

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIP vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DBA
DBA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPDBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.35

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

2.83

+1.75

TIP vs. DBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the DBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP and DBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIP vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and DBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPDBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-67.97%

+53.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-8.67%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

-12.36%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

-15.94%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

-37.97%

+23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-23.39%

+22.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-41.02%

+37.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

4.12%

-3.43%

Volatility

TIP vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.25%, while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPDBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.88%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

7.43%

-4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

10.83%

-7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.20%

13.86%

-7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

13.06%

-7.33%

TIP vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIP vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison

TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than DBA's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
3.29%3.58%4.08%4.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%1.55%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
4.44%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIP and DBA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBA has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to TIP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs DBA's -67.97%.

On 10-year performance, DBA leads with 4.14% vs 2.34% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBA has performed better with a 4.14% return vs 2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for DBA.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 3.29% for DBA.

TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DBA is Agricultural Commodities. TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TIP and 0.88% for DBA.

DBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP and DBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer