TINY vs. XT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 31.25%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

TINY vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return.

TINY

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: 15.50%
• YTD: 59.78%
• 6M: 60.21%
• 1Y: 114.15%
• 3Y*: 31.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XT

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 9.47%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 45.88%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	59.78%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.73%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	20.20%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and XT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.84

The correlation between TINY and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINY vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	XT
Technology	79.0%	43.5%
Healthcare	8.6%	23.4%
Basic Materials	7.7%	2.0%
Industrials	4.7%	10.1%
Communication Services	-	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	4.6%

Return for Risk

TINY vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 90
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 84
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINY	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	2.89	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	3.83	+0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.48	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.85	4.41	+2.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.13	18.51	+5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINY vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINY	XT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	2.89	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.66	-0.09

Drawdowns

TINY vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-34.41%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-10.45%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-22.09%	-20.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.47%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-7.41%	-8.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	2.49%	+2.26%

Volatility

TINY vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.04%	4.85%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.40%	11.94%	+14.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.66%	15.99%	+16.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.37%	20.76%	+11.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.37%	20.08%	+12.29%

TINY vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.18%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	6.61%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and XT in my portfolio?

TINY and XT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or XT?

TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or XT?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 18.83% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or XT?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or XT?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

What is the main difference between TINY and XT?

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.