TINY vs. TEKY
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and TEKY (Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TINY is passively managed, while TEKY is actively managed. Over the past year, TINY returned 112.70% vs 49.45% for TEKY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TEKY.
Performance
TINY vs. TEKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 55.68% return, which is significantly higher than TEKY's 27.21% return.
TINY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 55.68%
- 6M
- 59.30%
- 1Y
- 112.70%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEKY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 15.55%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 25.60%
- 1Y
- 49.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINY vs. TEKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 55.68% | 60.44% |
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | 27.21% | 50.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and TEKY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between TINY and TEKY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. TEKY — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
TEKY
TINY vs. TEKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINY | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.48 | 2.15 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | 2.79 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.78 | 2.36 | +4.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.93 | 6.56 | +17.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINY | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48 | 2.15 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 2.99 | -2.44 |
Drawdowns
TINY vs. TEKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than TEKY's maximum drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and TEKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -21.43% | -22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -21.43% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -4.83% | -11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 7.72% | -2.97% |
Volatility
TINY vs. TEKY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) at 7.33%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.97% | 7.33% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.33% | 18.32% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.58% | 23.07% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.36% | 25.44% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.36% | 25.44% | +6.92% |
TINY vs. TEKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TEKY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. TEKY - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than TEKY's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | 0.20% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.19% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and TEKY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to TEKY (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs TEKY's -21.43%.
On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 112.70% vs 49.45% for TEKY. On fees, TEKY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TEKY has been the lower-risk option at 7.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 112.70% return vs 49.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEKY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.
TEKY has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.19% for TINY.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.50% for TEKY.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and TEKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer