PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. MOON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. MOON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TINY

1D
3.75%
1M
19.80%
YTD
76.47%
6M
79.83%
1Y
126.79%
3Y*
33.52%
5Y*
10Y*

MOON

1D
-5.49%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. MOON - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TINY and MOON is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026

0.17

TINY vs. MOON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINY
MOON

Technology

70.5%
42.4%

Healthcare

10.4%
23.5%

Basic Materials

9.8%
1.2%

Industrials

4.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
11.9%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TINY
70.5%
MOON
42.4%

Healthcare

TINY
10.4%
MOON
23.5%

Basic Materials

TINY
9.8%
MOON
1.2%

Industrials

TINY
4.8%
MOON
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TINY
4.6%
MOON
11.9%

Communication Services

TINY

-

MOON
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

TINY

-

MOON

-

Energy

TINY

-

MOON

-

Financial Services

TINY

-

MOON
4.2%

Real Estate

TINY

-

MOON

-

Utilities

TINY

-

MOON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. MOON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MOON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. MOON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINYMOONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.18

TINY vs. MOON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINY vs. MOON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than MOON's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and MOON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYMOONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-15.19%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.19%

+15.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-10.52%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

Volatility

TINY vs. MOON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYMOONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.91%

13.68%

+20.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.58%

13.68%

+18.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.58%

13.68%

+18.90%

TINY vs. MOON - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MOON's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. MOON - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while MOON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MOON
Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.17%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and MOON have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MOON.

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for MOON.

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while MOON tracks S&P Kensho Moonshots Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.65% for MOON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and MOON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer