PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 55.62% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.40% return.


TINY

1D
-2.60%
1M
7.29%
YTD
55.62%
6M
55.41%
1Y
105.71%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.47%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
55.62%19.98%6.63%16.14%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.40%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and IBID is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

-0.04

The correlation between TINY and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINYIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.90

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.35

12.89

-6.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.33

39.18

-16.85

TINY vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINYIBIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

3.78

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

2.55

-2.00

Drawdowns

TINY vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-1.28%

-42.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-0.36%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-0.05%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-0.22%

-15.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

0.12%

+4.63%

Volatility

TINY vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.33%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.69%

0.33%

+11.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.55%

0.80%

+25.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.75%

1.24%

+31.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.38%

2.25%

+30.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.38%

2.25%

+30.13%

TINY vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than IBID's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.67%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.19%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINY has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to IBID (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 105.71% vs 4.68% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 105.71% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.19% for TINY.

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer