TINY vs. BKGI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI).

TINY and BKGI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TINY is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2021. BKGI is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Nov 2, 2022.

Performance

TINY vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TINY vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	18.28%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	5.88%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	10.64%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	8.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 10.64% return.

TINY

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: -8.60%
• YTD: 18.28%
• 6M: 20.16%
• 1Y: 67.56%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 15.16%
• 1Y: 32.13%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

BKGI

Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF

TINY

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

Return for Risk

TINY vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 88
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 93
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINY	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.20	-0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.79	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	3.20	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	16.13	-2.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINY vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and BKGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINY	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.20	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.66	-1.31

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and BKGI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TINY vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than BKGI's 2.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.25%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.73%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TINY vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-14.79%	-29.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-10.35%	-6.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.15%	-3.56%	-6.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-2.60%	-14.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	2.05%	+2.94%

Volatility

TINY vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.13%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.37%	4.13%	+9.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.02%	7.90%	+17.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.65%	14.67%	+20.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.08%	14.06%	+18.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.08%	14.06%	+18.02%