TINRX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

TINRX (Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A) and QQQX (Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - TINRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while QQQX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nuveen. TINRX is passively managed, while QQQX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TINRX returned 14.49%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for QQQX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINRX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

TINRX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TINRX having a 10.43% return and QQQX slightly higher at 10.47%. Over the past 10 years, TINRX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.

TINRX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 10.43%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 1Y: 21.51%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 14.49%

QQQX

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -2.76%
• 6M: 10.47%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 1Y: 24.77%
• 3Y*: 15.13%
• 5Y*: 8.54%
• 10Y*: 13.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINRX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A	10.43%	16.71%	23.38%	25.60%	-19.38%	25.30%	20.46%	30.56%	-5.55%	19.06%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	10.47%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TINRX and QQQX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007	0.74

The correlation between TINRX and QQQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TINRX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINRX

TINRX Risk / Return Rank: 62
TINRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TINRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TINRX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TINRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TINRX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINRX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINRX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.59	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.31	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.73	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	10.67	+0.35

TINRX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINRX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINRX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINRX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.63%	-57.25%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	-9.11%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.32%	-22.80%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	-29.33%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.92%	-35.96%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-2.94%	+1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.60%	-8.00%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.33%	-0.31%

Volatility

TINRX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) is 5.00%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that TINRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINRX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	7.29%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.08%	13.16%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	15.67%	-2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	20.04%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.38%	21.12%	-2.74%

TINRX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINRX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than QQQX's 8.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	8.22%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A	1.88%	2.08%	1.34%	1.20%	1.54%	1.79%	1.17%	1.70%	2.08%	0.51%	2.13%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINRX and QQQX in my portfolio?

TINRX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINRX or QQQX?

QQQX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to TINRX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.