TINRX vs. FLCPX
TINRX (Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TINRX returned 14.56%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for FLCPX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TINRX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.
Performance
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TINRX having a 10.28% return and FLCPX slightly lower at 10.21%. Over the past 10 years, TINRX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 14.56%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
TINRX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
FLCPX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A | 10.28% | 16.71% | 23.38% | 25.60% | -19.38% | 25.30% | 20.46% | 30.56% | -5.55% | 19.06% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 10.21% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINRX and FLCPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016 | 0.99 |
The correlation between TINRX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINRX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
TINRX
FLCPX
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINRX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.05 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 13.79 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and FLCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINRX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | -33.87% | -21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -8.89% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -18.76% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -24.40% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -33.87% | -1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -1.35% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -4.18% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.96% | +0.03% |
Volatility
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINRX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.76% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 9.90% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 12.48% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 17.16% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 18.20% | +0.23% |
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINRX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A | 1.88% | 2.08% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 1.17% | 1.70% | 2.08% | 0.51% | 2.13% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TINRX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TINRX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FLCPX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.
FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINRX and FLCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer