TINRX vs. POGSX
TINRX (Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A) and POGSX (Pin Oak Equity) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TINRX returned 14.56%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for POGSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINRX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for POGSX.
Performance
TINRX vs. POGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINRX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than POGSX's 17.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TINRX having a 14.56% annualized return and POGSX not far behind at 14.08%.
TINRX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
POGSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- 37.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
TINRX vs. POGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A | 10.28% | 16.71% | 23.38% | 25.60% | -19.38% | 25.30% | 20.46% | 30.56% | -5.55% | 19.06% |
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 17.12% | 27.41% | 18.99% | 27.16% | -25.10% | 21.42% | 10.60% | 27.72% | -6.15% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINRX and POGSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TINRX and POGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINRX vs. POGSX — Risk / Return Rank
TINRX
POGSX
TINRX vs. POGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Pin Oak Equity (POGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINRX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.53 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 16.30 | -2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINRX vs. POGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, smaller than the maximum POGSX drawdown of -89.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and POGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINRX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | -89.46% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -8.03% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -15.76% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -29.81% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -33.05% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.77% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -36.67% | +29.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.23% | -0.24% |
Volatility
TINRX vs. POGSX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) at 3.94%. This indicates that TINRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINRX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 3.94% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 12.90% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 15.34% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 17.79% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 18.55% | -0.12% |
TINRX vs. POGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than POGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINRX vs. POGSX - Dividend Comparison
TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than POGSX's 16.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 16.22% | 8.85% | 17.87% | 8.21% | 0.15% | 10.93% | 4.60% | 3.22% | 2.94% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 3.83% |
TINRX Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A | 1.88% | 2.08% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 1.17% | 1.70% | 2.08% | 0.51% | 2.13% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINRX and POGSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINRX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to POGSX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs POGSX's -89.46%.
POGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINRX and POGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer