PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINRX vs. JQC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINRX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINRX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TINRX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 14.60%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


TINRX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.65%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
14.60%

JQC

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.62%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINRX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
11.33%16.71%23.38%25.60%-19.38%25.30%20.46%30.56%-5.55%19.06%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
0.73%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TINRX and JQC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between TINRX and JQC has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINRX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINRX
TINRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TINRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TINRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINRX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINRXJQCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

0.21

+2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

0.38

+2.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.05

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

0.23

+3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.43

0.46

+14.97

TINRX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINRX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINRXJQCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

0.21

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.36

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.33

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.23

+0.30

Drawdowns

TINRX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINRX drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINRX and JQC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINRXJQCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

-75.18%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-10.15%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-15.37%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-19.83%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

-47.99%

+13.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.34%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-8.82%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

5.04%

-3.11%

Volatility

TINRX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A (TINRX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 2.16%. This indicates that TINRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINRXJQCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.16%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

8.80%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

11.11%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

13.17%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

17.56%

+0.83%

TINRX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINRX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINRX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

TINRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than JQC's 13.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.22%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%
TINRX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class A
1.87%2.08%1.34%1.20%1.54%1.79%1.17%1.70%2.08%0.51%2.13%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINRX and JQC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINRX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to JQC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINRX dropped -55.63% vs JQC's -75.18%.

TINRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINRX and JQC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer