TIMVX vs. FSLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX).
TIMVX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. FSLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1983.
Performance
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIMVX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.22% | 10.11% | 14.48% | 11.40% | -10.44% | 32.27% | -4.21% | 27.33% | -14.43% | 9.30% |
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 7.17% | 0.24% | 9.25% | 20.54% | -7.37% | 33.32% | 8.24% | 34.54% | -16.90% | 17.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIMVX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TIMVX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.
TIMVX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
FSLSX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIMVX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank
TIMVX
FSLSX
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIMVX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.67 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.05 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.09 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 4.12 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIMVX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.67 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.40 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIMVX and FSLSX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison
TIMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIMVX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund | 7.75% | 8.23% | 7.09% | 1.63% | 15.58% | 14.87% | 1.77% | 20.99% | 18.64% | 7.13% | 4.60% | 10.06% |
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.41% | 2.49% | 2.13% | 7.29% | 0.84% | 4.84% | 14.59% | 6.57% | 19.71% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIMVX drawdown since its inception was -59.15%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMVX and FSLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIMVX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.15% | -69.87% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -9.79% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.97% | -26.81% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.60% | -47.98% | -4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -6.55% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -8.30% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 4.05% | -1.14% |
Volatility
TIMVX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 5.79% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIMVX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 6.09% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 15.21% | -5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 23.99% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 20.47% | -2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 21.89% | -0.21% |