PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMVX vs. DFSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TIMVX having a 15.11% return and DFSVX slightly higher at 15.21%. Over the past 10 years, TIMVX has underperformed DFSVX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while DFSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.


TIMVX

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.83%
YTD
15.11%
6M
16.47%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
9.17%

DFSVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
15.21%
6M
16.59%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIMVX
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund
15.11%10.11%14.48%11.40%-10.44%32.27%-4.21%27.33%-14.43%9.30%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
15.21%8.37%9.58%19.02%-3.57%39.97%2.24%18.15%-15.13%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMVX and DFSVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.92

The correlation between TIMVX and DFSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMVX vs. DFSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIMVX
TIMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TIMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSVX
DFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIMVXDFSVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.04

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

2.98

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.68

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.67

11.79

+3.89

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the DFSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMVX and DFSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIMVXDFSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.04

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.48

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.52

-0.02

Drawdowns

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMVX drawdown since its inception was -59.15%, smaller than the maximum DFSVX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMVX and DFSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMVXDFSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.15%

-66.70%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-9.59%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.97%

-27.69%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.97%

-27.69%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.60%

-52.12%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.55%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-9.47%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.99%

-1.11%

Volatility

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund (TIMVX) is 3.85%, while DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that TIMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMVXDFSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.16%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

11.31%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

17.54%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

21.48%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

23.90%

-2.19%

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIMVX vs. DFSVX - Dividend Comparison

TIMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than DFSVX's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
1.51%1.69%1.47%3.67%6.77%10.40%1.96%2.83%7.54%5.18%4.18%5.29%
TIMVX
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Value Fund
7.15%8.23%7.09%1.63%15.58%14.87%1.77%20.99%18.64%7.13%4.60%10.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, TIMVX and DFSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFSVX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to TIMVX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMVX dropped -59.15% vs DFSVX's -66.70%.

TIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMVX and DFSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer