PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMIX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIMIX achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TIMIX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.23% annualized return.


TIMIX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.74%
YTD
6.20%
6M
6.20%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
8.32%

DGTSX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.76%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.30%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIMIX
TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund
6.20%14.98%10.47%16.25%-16.83%9.96%15.40%20.53%-6.88%14.97%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.30%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMIX and DGTSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.94

The correlation between TIMIX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMIX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIMIX
TIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMIXDGTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.57

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.79

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

16.65

-6.43

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMIX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMIX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMIXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.37%

-16.71%

-24.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-2.64%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.44%

-7.46%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-11.26%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.64%

-11.26%

-13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-1.64%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.60%

+1.08%

Volatility

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TIMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMIXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

1.42%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

2.98%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

3.59%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

5.98%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

5.24%

+5.67%

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIMIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIMIX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

TIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.70%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
TIMIX
TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund
6.44%7.33%4.43%2.78%7.92%11.50%8.51%5.66%6.31%2.56%4.92%4.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TIMIX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIMIX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to DGTSX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMIX dropped -41.37% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMIX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer