PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMIX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIMIX achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 6.99% return.


TIMIX

1D
1.47%
1M
-0.58%
6M
3.06%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
7.90%
ALL TIME*
6.59%

FSRKX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
6M
3.39%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TIMIX
TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund
4.93%14.98%10.47%16.25%-16.83%9.96%15.40%6.32%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
6.99%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMIX and FSRKX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between TIMIX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMIX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIMIX
TIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMIXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.55

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

11.71

-4.76

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMIX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMIX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMIXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.37%

-19.93%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-3.60%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.44%

-5.84%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-12.74%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-2.37%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-3.19%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.11%

+0.61%

Volatility

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund (TIMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.83%. This indicates that TIMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMIXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

1.83%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

3.90%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

5.06%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

6.94%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.87%

7.75%

+3.12%

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIMIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIMIX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

TIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than FSRKX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
3.29%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIMIX
TIAA-CREF Managed Allocation Fund
6.61%7.33%4.43%2.78%7.92%11.50%8.51%5.66%6.31%2.56%4.92%4.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIMIX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIMIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FSRKX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMIX dropped -41.37% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMIX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer