TIME vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TIME (Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIME is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Clockwise, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TIME returned 17.48% vs 106.92% for WNTR. Their -0.55 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.

Performance

TIME vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIME achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.51% return.

TIME

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 7.90%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.58%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.31%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 1Y: 106.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	$51.24K	$43.99K	$100.40K
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.92M	$3.66M	$3.95M

TIME vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	7.94%	17.61%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	10.51%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TIME and WNTR is -0.53, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.55

The correlation between TIME and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TIME vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 44
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 41

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIME vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIME	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.97	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.27	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	2.52	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	6.38	-1.80

TIME vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIME Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIME and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TIME vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIME drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIME and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIME	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.26%	-42.65%	+18.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-42.65%	+29.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-9.84%	+7.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-20.15%	+14.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	16.83%	-13.00%

Volatility

TIME vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) is 4.07%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that TIME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIME	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	13.00%	-8.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.18%	47.22%	-36.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.25%	54.66%	-40.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	53.34%	-35.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	53.34%	-35.79%

TIME vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TIME and WNTR have an expense ratio of 1.00%.

Dividends

TIME vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	9.28%	10.02%	15.84%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	107.26%	58.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIME and WNTR in my portfolio?

TIME and WNTR have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIME or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to TIME (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIME dropped -24.26% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, TIME or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs 17.48% for TIME. Both ETFs have the same 1.00% expense ratio. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TIME or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIME or WNTR?

TIME and WNTR have the same expense ratio: 1.00% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TIME or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 9.28% for TIME.

What is the main difference between TIME and WNTR?

TIME is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Clockwise and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.