TILT vs. SCHK
TILT (FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TILT tracks the Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TILT returned 12.22%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for SCHK. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TILT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
TILT vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TILT having a 10.78% return and SCHK slightly lower at 10.46%.
TILT
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
SCHK
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
TILT vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund | 10.78% | 16.59% | 19.88% | 24.70% | -17.25% | 27.61% | 16.05% | 29.01% | -8.93% | 5.22% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 10.46% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILT and SCHK is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TILT and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
TILT vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TILT
SCHK
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
TILT
SCHK
Financial Services
TILT
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
TILT
SCHK
Industrials
TILT
SCHK
Healthcare
TILT
SCHK
Communication Services
TILT
SCHK
Energy
TILT
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
TILT
SCHK
Real Estate
TILT
SCHK
Basic Materials
TILT
SCHK
Utilities
TILT
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILT vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
TILT
SCHK
TILT vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TILT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.00 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 13.44 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TILT vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than SCHK's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -34.80% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.97% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -19.21% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -25.44% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -1.26% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -5.16% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.00% | -0.03% |
Volatility
TILT vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) is 4.35%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that TILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.84% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 10.07% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 12.74% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.33% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 19.12% | -0.34% |
TILT vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TILT vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.60% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.55% | 1.60% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TILT and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to TILT (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.28% vs 12.22% for TILT. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.28% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TILT.
TILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.
TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.03% for SCHK.
TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILT and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer