TIHGX vs. GXXIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TIHGX (The Investment House Growth Fund) and GXXIX (abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TIHGX returned 15.34%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for GXXIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIHGX charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GXXIX.

Performance

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's 6.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TIHGX having a 15.34% annualized return and GXXIX not far behind at 14.68%.

TIHGX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 8.19%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 15.34%

GXXIX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 14.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund	1.42%	10.35%	31.44%	49.94%	-37.04%	21.26%	39.61%	32.82%	-4.47%	34.06%
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	6.22%	3.82%	10.11%	15.19%	-26.55%	81.37%	29.56%	36.96%	-6.73%	20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TIHGX and GXXIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011	0.85

The correlation between TIHGX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TIHGX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIHGX

TIHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
TIHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TIHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TIHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TIHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TIHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GXXIX

GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 14
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIHGX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.03	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.51	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.18	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	1.04	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	3.99	-2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIHGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIHGX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIHGX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	1.03	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.42	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.62	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.65	-0.17

Drawdowns

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and GXXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIHGX	GXXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.34%	-33.65%	-23.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.95%	-11.78%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-19.74%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.66%	-33.65%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.66%	-33.65%	-7.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.55%	-0.47%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-6.16%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	3.06%	+2.01%

Volatility

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 2.96%. This indicates that TIHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIHGX	GXXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	2.96%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	9.34%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.98%	11.91%	+3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.49%	27.77%	-5.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.02%	23.72%	-1.70%

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIHGX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GXXIX's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	2.16%	2.30%	0.00%	0.28%	0.39%	59.39%	14.10%	9.76%	12.93%	10.11%	12.20%	5.82%
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund	0.03%	0.03%	0.00%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIHGX and GXXIX in my portfolio?

TIHGX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIHGX or GXXIX?

TIHGX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to GXXIX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIHGX dropped -57.34% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GXXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.