PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIGRX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGRX achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TIGRX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 14.77%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


TIGRX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.35%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.30%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
14.77%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
8.50%13.92%29.01%32.97%-22.15%25.55%20.49%30.29%-7.33%23.72%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGRX and SWPPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 1999

0.98

The correlation between TIGRX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIGRX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGRX
TIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIGRXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.36

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

15.67

-5.93

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGRX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIGRXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.52

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.51

-0.09

Drawdowns

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGRX drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGRX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIGRXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-55.06%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-8.89%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.79%

-18.74%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-24.51%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

-33.80%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-9.95%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.90%

+0.79%

Volatility

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that TIGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIGRXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.83%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

8.98%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

11.87%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

16.93%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

18.23%

+3.14%

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGRX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIGRX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

TIGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
12.78%14.09%11.70%24.27%9.52%19.80%7.44%6.61%9.98%4.60%3.06%8.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TIGRX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIGRX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGRX dropped -49.52% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIGRX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer