TIGR vs. ZVRA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) and ZVRA (Zevra Therapeutics Inc.) are both stocks. TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ZVRA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, TIGR returned -30.09%/yr vs -2.85%/yr for ZVRA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGR achieves a -50.10% return, which is significantly lower than ZVRA's 41.18% return.

TIGR

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -28.16%
• YTD: -50.10%
• 6M: -48.38%
• 1Y: -44.73%
• 3Y*: 14.77%
• 5Y*: -30.09%
• 10Y*: —

ZVRA

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: 13.76%
• YTD: 41.18%
• 6M: 51.86%
• 1Y: 35.01%
• 3Y*: 29.54%
• 5Y*: -2.85%
• 10Y*: -16.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited	-50.10%	47.99%	46.15%	29.62%	-30.55%	-38.16%	123.66%	-56.23%
ZVRA Zevra Therapeutics Inc.	41.18%	7.43%	27.33%	42.70%	-47.30%	-22.23%	84.70%	-81.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGR and ZVRA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019	0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap TIGR : $848.95M ZVRA : $761.92M
EPS TIGR : $0.62 ZVRA : $2.16
PE Ratio TIGR : 7.75 ZVRA : 5.85
PS Ratio TIGR : 1.37 ZVRA : 5.94
PB Ratio TIGR : 1.01 ZVRA : 3.70
Total Revenue (TTM) TIGR : $645.56M ZVRA : $122.29M
Gross Profit (TTM) TIGR : $533.82M ZVRA : $104.94M
EBITDA (TTM) TIGR : $236.90M ZVRA : $149.15M

Return for Risk

TIGR vs. ZVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGR

TIGR Risk / Return Rank: 15
TIGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TIGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TIGR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TIGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TIGR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

ZVRA

ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 60
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIGR	ZVRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	0.56	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	1.27	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.16	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	0.81	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	1.41	-2.73

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ZVRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGR and ZVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGR drawdown since its inception was -93.65%, smaller than the maximum ZVRA drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGR and ZVRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIGR	ZVRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.65%	-99.27%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.44%	-43.47%	-22.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.44%	-43.47%	-22.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.04%	-74.01%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-97.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.01%	-96.65%	+9.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.92%	-86.41%	+8.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.97%	24.87%	+9.10%

Volatility

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Volatility Comparison

UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a higher volatility of 35.17% compared to Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) at 24.56%. This indicates that TIGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIGR	ZVRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.17%	24.56%	+10.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.45%	40.23%	+8.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.06%	62.90%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.74%	60.49%	+22.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.54%	81.46%	+9.08%

Dividends

TIGR vs. ZVRA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TIGR nor ZVRA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIGR and ZVRA in my portfolio?

TIGR and ZVRA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIGR or ZVRA?

TIGR has higher volatility (35.17%) compared to ZVRA (24.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGR dropped -93.65% vs ZVRA's -99.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.