TIGR vs. AGI
TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, TIGR returned -30.09%/yr vs 33.02%/yr for AGI. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TIGR vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIGR achieves a -50.10% return, which is significantly lower than AGI's -8.58% return.
TIGR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -50.10%
- 6M
- -48.38%
- 1Y
- -44.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- -30.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AGI
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 42.45%
- 5Y*
- 33.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
TIGR vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -50.10% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -38.16% | 123.66% | -56.23% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.58% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGR and AGI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TIGR and AGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TIGR:
$848.95M
AGI:
$14.85B
TIGR:
$0.62
AGI:
$2.52
TIGR:
7.75
AGI:
13.99
TIGR:
0.09
AGI:
0.09
TIGR:
1.37
AGI:
7.19
TIGR:
1.01
AGI:
3.21
TIGR:
$645.56M
AGI:
$2.07B
TIGR:
$533.82M
AGI:
$1.22B
TIGR:
$236.90M
AGI:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIGR vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
TIGR
AGI
TIGR vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIGR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.13 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.71 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 2.03 | -3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIGR vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGR drawdown since its inception was -93.65%, which is greater than AGI's maximum drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGR and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.65% | -88.13% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.44% | -40.29% | -26.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.44% | -40.29% | -26.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.04% | -40.29% | -51.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.01% | -36.25% | -50.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.92% | -37.73% | -40.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.97% | 14.05% | +19.92% |
Volatility
TIGR vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a higher volatility of 35.17% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 17.80%. This indicates that TIGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIGR | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.17% | 17.80% | +17.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.45% | 43.01% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.06% | 51.64% | +15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.74% | 41.39% | +41.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.54% | 48.44% | +42.10% |
Dividends
TIGR vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TIGR vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UP Fintech Holding Limited and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TIGR vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.02M and revenue of 588.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 337.66M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.75M and revenue of 588.43M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TIGR and AGI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (35.17%) compared to AGI (17.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGR dropped -93.65% vs AGI's -88.13%.
AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIGR and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer