TIER vs. BSCQ
TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIER is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. TIER is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
TIER vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.68% return.
TIER
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
TIER vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 13.19% | 12.72% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIER and BSCQ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIER vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
TIER
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
TIER vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIER | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 41.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 181.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIER vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIER | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -16.50% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -0.03% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -2.83% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
TIER vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIER | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 0.61% | +15.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 3.29% | +13.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 4.75% | +11.74% |
TIER vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIER vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIER and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TIER.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.66% for TIER.
TIER is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for TIER and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer