TIC vs. AIA
TIC (Acuren Corp) is a stock, while AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50 Index. Over the past year, TIC returned -33.73% vs 66.32% for AIA. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TIC vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIC achieves a -27.70% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 37.37% return.
TIC
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -9.86%
- 6M
- -27.62%
- YTD
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -33.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -32.95%
AIA
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 22.48%
- YTD
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- 66.32%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $72.11M | $68.43M | $74.19M | |
TIC Acuren Corp | $13.50M | $14.23M | $17.75M |
TIC vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIC Acuren Corp | -27.70% | -22.23% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 37.37% | 33.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIC and AIA is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIC vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
TIC
AIA
TIC vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuren Corp (TIC) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIC | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.35 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.81 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 12.04 | -13.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIC vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIC drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIC and AIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIC | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -60.89% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.87% | -16.83% | -38.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.55% | -11.13% | -38.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -16.61% | -10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.76% | 5.32% | +28.44% |
Volatility
TIC vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
Acuren Corp (TIC) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) at 11.50%. This indicates that TIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIC | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 11.50% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.71% | 28.26% | +8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.59% | 31.64% | +22.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.83% | 26.69% | +25.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.83% | 24.17% | +27.66% |
Dividends
TIC vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
TIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.60% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
TIC Acuren Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIC and AIA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIC has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to AIA (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIC dropped -54.87% vs AIA's -60.89%.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIC and AIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer