TIC vs. BDMAX
TIC (Acuren Corp) is a stock, while BDMAX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A) is Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past year, TIC returned -33.73% vs 23.19% for BDMAX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TIC vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIC achieves a -27.70% return, which is significantly lower than BDMAX's 11.82% return.
TIC
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -9.86%
- 6M
- -27.62%
- YTD
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -33.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -32.95%
BDMAX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
TIC Acuren Corp | $13.50M | $14.23M | $17.75M |
TIC vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIC Acuren Corp | -27.70% | -22.23% |
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A | 11.82% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIC and BDMAX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIC vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank
TIC
BDMAX
TIC vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuren Corp (TIC) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIC | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.60 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 7.28 | -7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 19.24 | -20.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIC vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIC drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIC and BDMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIC | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -12.37% | -42.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.87% | -3.25% | -51.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.55% | -1.15% | -48.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -2.80% | -23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.76% | 1.23% | +32.53% |
Volatility
TIC vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison
Acuren Corp (TIC) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX) at 2.58%. This indicates that TIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIC | BDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 2.58% | +11.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.71% | 5.36% | +31.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.59% | 7.39% | +47.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.83% | 6.67% | +45.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.83% | 5.90% | +45.93% |
Dividends
TIC vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison
TIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A | 11.66% | 8.94% | 13.39% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 1.25% | 0.04% | 6.60% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% |
TIC Acuren Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIC and BDMAX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIC has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to BDMAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIC dropped -54.87% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.
BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIC and BDMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer