PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBWX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBWX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.82% return.


TIBWX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.64%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

PRSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.82%
6M
3.04%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBWX
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund
0.68%4.24%4.60%9.06%-11.39%-2.19%4.81%9.96%0.39%5.66%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.82%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBWX and PRSNX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.68

The correlation between TIBWX and PRSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBWX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBWX
TIBWX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TIBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBWXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

2.77

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

5.02

-3.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.67

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.66

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

16.41

-12.93

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBWX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBWXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.77

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.43

-0.66

Drawdowns

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBWX drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBWX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBWXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-19.70%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.18%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-2.87%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.06%

-19.70%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.10%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-2.36%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.48%

+0.47%

Volatility

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.83%. This indicates that TIBWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBWXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.83%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

2.31%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

2.88%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

4.30%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

4.13%

-0.82%

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

TIBWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than PRSNX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.63%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%
TIBWX
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund
1.52%1.53%1.95%0.24%11.88%2.03%2.75%5.40%3.93%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBWX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBWX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to PRSNX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBWX dropped -16.47% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBWX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer