TIBWX vs. PRSNX
TIBWX (TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund) and PRSNX (T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TIBWX returned 1.17%/yr vs 2.13%/yr for PRSNX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIBWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRSNX.
Performance
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIBWX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.72% return.
TIBWX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PRSNX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 1.02% | 4.24% | 4.60% | 9.06% | -11.39% | -2.19% | 4.81% | 9.96% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 1.72% | 9.31% | 5.60% | 12.77% | -16.27% | 0.40% | 8.16% | 11.94% | 0.45% | 6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBWX and PRSNX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TIBWX and PRSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIBWX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBWX
PRSNX
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIBWX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.65 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 3.50 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 15.65 | -12.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBWX drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBWX and PRSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBWX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -19.70% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.18% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.99% | -2.87% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.06% | -19.70% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.20% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -2.35% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.48% | +0.50% |
Volatility
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) have volatilities of 0.74% and 0.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIBWX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.72% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64% | 2.86% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.40% | 4.30% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 4.13% | -0.82% |
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIBWX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison
TIBWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than PRSNX's 6.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 6.64% | 7.87% | 6.36% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.95% | 3.68% | 6.33% | 4.89% | 3.59% | 3.44% | 3.60% |
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 1.52% | 1.53% | 1.95% | 0.24% | 11.88% | 2.03% | 2.75% | 5.40% | 3.93% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIBWX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIBWX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to PRSNX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBWX dropped -16.47% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.
PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIBWX and PRSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer