TIBWX vs. DGFFX
TIBWX (TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund) and DGFFX (Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TIBWX returned 1.06%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for DGFFX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIBWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DGFFX.
Performance
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIBWX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 2.44% return.
TIBWX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
DGFFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 0.56% | 4.24% | 4.60% | 9.06% | -11.39% | -2.19% | 4.81% | 9.96% | 0.39% | 4.67% |
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 2.44% | 5.84% | 8.04% | 7.82% | -6.09% | 4.91% | 3.59% | 6.64% | -0.35% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBWX and DGFFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2017 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIBWX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBWX
DGFFX
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIBWX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 4.09 | -2.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 6.58 | -4.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 2.04 | -0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.25 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 10.21 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIBWX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 4.09 | -2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 1.59 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.53 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBWX drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBWX and DGFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBWX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -12.69% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -1.19% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.99% | -3.38% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.06% | -8.17% | -7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.03% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -1.33% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.70% | +0.24% |
Volatility
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) at 0.68%. This indicates that TIBWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIBWX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.68% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 1.47% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 2.05% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 2.42% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 2.60% | +0.72% |
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison
TIBWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DGFFX's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 6.25% | 5.52% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 3.37% | 4.14% | 4.22% | 4.18% | 3.79% | 2.94% |
TIBWX TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.95% | 0.24% | 11.88% | 2.03% | 2.75% | 5.40% | 3.93% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIBWX and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIBWX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to DGFFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBWX dropped -16.47% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.
DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIBWX and DGFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer