PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBWX vs. DGFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBWX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 2.44% return.


TIBWX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.68%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*

DGFFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.95%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBWX
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund
0.56%4.24%4.60%9.06%-11.39%-2.19%4.81%9.96%0.39%4.67%
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.44%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBWX and DGFFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2017

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBWX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBWX
TIBWX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TIBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBWXDGFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

4.09

-2.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

6.58

-4.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.04

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.25

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

10.21

-6.49

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the DGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBWX and DGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBWXDGFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

4.09

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

1.59

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.53

-0.76

Drawdowns

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBWX drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBWX and DGFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBWXDGFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-12.69%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-1.19%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-3.38%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.06%

-8.17%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.03%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-1.33%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.70%

+0.24%

Volatility

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund (TIBWX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) at 0.68%. This indicates that TIBWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBWXDGFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.68%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

1.47%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

2.05%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

2.42%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.32%

2.60%

+0.72%

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIBWX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison

TIBWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DGFFX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.25%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%
TIBWX
TIAA-CREF International Bond Fund
1.53%1.53%1.95%0.24%11.88%2.03%2.75%5.40%3.93%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBWX and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBWX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to DGFFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBWX dropped -16.47% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBWX and DGFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer