PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBIX vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBIX vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBIX achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBIX has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.


TIBIX

1D
-1.79%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.21%
1Y
35.64%
3Y*
25.80%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
12.32%

XOM

1D
1.22%
1M
5.68%
YTD
27.80%
6M
32.61%
1Y
50.17%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBIX vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
14.92%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
27.80%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBIX and XOM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2003

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between TIBIX and XOM has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBIX vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBIX vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBIXXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.34

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.63

3.21

+3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.67

8.97

+16.70

TIBIX vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBIX and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBIXXOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

2.07

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

0.90

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.36

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.48

+0.28

Drawdowns

TIBIX vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBIX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBIX and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBIXXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-62.40%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-15.69%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.23%

-18.92%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.79%

-20.51%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-61.34%

+26.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-10.90%

+8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-10.20%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

5.61%

-4.22%

Volatility

TIBIX vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) is 3.34%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that TIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBIXXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

9.20%

-5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

20.29%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

24.44%

-15.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

26.73%

-15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

28.19%

-14.68%

Dividends

TIBIX vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

TIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than XOM's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.16%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.69%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBIX and XOM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to TIBIX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBIX dropped -48.88% vs XOM's -62.40%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBIX and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer