TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS
TI5A.AS (iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XUSE.AS (iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TI5A.AS is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while XUSE.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TI5A.AS returned 4.54% vs 22.53% for XUSE.AS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TI5A.AS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XUSE.AS.
Performance
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TI5A.AS achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than XUSE.AS's 8.38% return.
TI5A.AS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUSE.AS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TI5A.AS iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 2.15% | 5.09% |
XUSE.AS iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF | 8.38% | 25.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TI5A.AS and XUSE.AS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS — Risk / Return Rank
TI5A.AS
XUSE.AS
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) and iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TI5A.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.28 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.11 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.52 | 7.72 | +11.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TI5A.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.52 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 1.56 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TI5A.AS drawdown since its inception was -3.98%, smaller than the maximum XUSE.AS drawdown of -12.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TI5A.AS and XUSE.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TI5A.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -12.97% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -10.54% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.23% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -1.72% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 2.90% | -2.67% |
Volatility
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) is 0.50%, while iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that TI5A.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TI5A.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 4.32% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 12.35% | -10.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 14.62% | -12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 16.45% | -13.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 16.45% | -13.40% |
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TI5A.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSE.AS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TI5A.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TI5A.AS nor XUSE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TI5A.AS and XUSE.AS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TI5A.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TI5A.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XUSE.AS.
TI5A.AS is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XUSE.AS is Global Equities. TI5A.AS tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while XUSE.AS tracks MSCI World ex USA Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TI5A.AS and 0.25% for XUSE.AS.
Find the right allocation for TI5A.AS and XUSE.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer