PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TI5A.AS achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than WINC.AS's 8.19% return.


TI5A.AS

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.16%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
10Y*

WINC.AS

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.21%
YTD
8.19%
6M
9.90%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TI5A.AS and WINC.AS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TI5A.AS
TI5A.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TI5A.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TI5A.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TI5A.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TI5A.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TI5A.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WINC.AS
WINC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TI5A.ASWINC.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

3.68

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.64

15.56

+4.08

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TI5A.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TI5A.AS and WINC.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TI5A.ASWINC.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.35

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

1.58

-0.07

Drawdowns

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TI5A.AS drawdown since its inception was -3.98%, smaller than the maximum WINC.AS drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TI5A.AS and WINC.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TI5A.ASWINC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-14.81%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-6.77%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.98%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.54%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

1.60%

-1.37%

Volatility

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) is 0.52%, while iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that TI5A.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TI5A.ASWINC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

3.10%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

8.24%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

10.58%

-8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.05%

13.85%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.05%

13.85%

-10.80%

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TI5A.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WINC.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TI5A.AS vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison

TI5A.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TI5A.AS and WINC.AS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TI5A.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TI5A.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WINC.AS.

TI5A.AS is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while WINC.AS is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TI5A.AS and 0.35% for WINC.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TI5A.AS and WINC.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer