TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS
TI5A.AS (iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - TI5A.AS is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while IWDA.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TI5A.AS returned 5.17%/yr vs 20.87%/yr for IWDA.AS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TI5A.AS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.AS.
Performance
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TI5A.AS is traded in USD, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TI5A.AS achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.AS's 9.77% return.
TI5A.AS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 26.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TI5A.AS iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 2.16% | 5.92% | 4.73% | 4.70% | -1.86% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.77% | 21.46% | 19.36% | 23.68% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TI5A.AS and IWDA.AS is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
TI5A.AS
IWDA.AS
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TI5A.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 3.11 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.64 | 13.42 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TI5A.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.27 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.68 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TI5A.AS drawdown since its inception was -3.98%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.AS drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TI5A.AS and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TI5A.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -34.11% | +30.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -8.39% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.28% | -17.83% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.56% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -4.64% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 1.95% | -1.72% |
Volatility
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (TI5A.AS) is 0.52%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that TI5A.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TI5A.AS | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 3.28% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 8.59% | -6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 11.52% | -9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 15.47% | -12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 15.80% | -12.75% |
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TI5A.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TI5A.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TI5A.AS nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TI5A.AS and IWDA.AS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TI5A.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TI5A.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
TI5A.AS is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IWDA.AS is Global Equities. TI5A.AS tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TI5A.AS and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.
Find the right allocation for TI5A.AS and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer