THYM vs. RVNU
THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while RVNU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. THYM is actively managed, while RVNU is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THYM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
THYM vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THYM achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 4.29% return.
THYM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
THYM vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.74% | 0.25% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 4.29% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between THYM and RVNU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THYM vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
THYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RVNU
THYM vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THYM | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THYM vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THYM drawdown since its inception was -2.93%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THYM and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THYM | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -23.51% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -2.26% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -4.95% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
THYM vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THYM | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29% | 4.90% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 7.20% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 7.24% | -2.95% |
THYM vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
THYM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
THYM vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
THYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than RVNU's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.57% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THYM and RVNU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.57% for THYM.
THYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while RVNU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for THYM and 0.15% for RVNU.
Find the right allocation for THYM and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer