THYM vs. IBMO
THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while IBMO is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index. THYM is actively managed, while IBMO is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THYM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.
Performance
THYM vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THYM achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBMO's 1.01% return.
THYM
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
THYM vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.86% | 0.25% |
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.01% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between THYM and IBMO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THYM vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank
THYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBMO
THYM vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THYM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THYM vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THYM drawdown since its inception was -2.93%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THYM and IBMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THYM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -14.77% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -2.31% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility
THYM vs. IBMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THYM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 1.10% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 2.14% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 4.50% | -0.17% |
THYM vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
THYM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
THYM vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison
THYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than IBMO's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.39% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.17% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THYM and IBMO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.17% for THYM.
THYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while IBMO is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for THYM and 0.18% for IBMO.
Find the right allocation for THYM and IBMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer