PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THY vs. UMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THY vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THY achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 22.52% return.


THY

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*

UMI

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
22.52%
6M
22.06%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
27.26%
5Y*
20.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THY vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
THY
Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF
0.45%4.44%5.38%4.97%-5.62%-0.46%4.04%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
22.52%5.11%42.97%14.60%20.78%20.97%26.99%

Correlation

The correlation between THY and UMI is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between THY and UMI has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

THY vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THY
UMI

Financial Services

99.9%

-

Energy

0.1%
99.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

THY
99.9%
UMI

-

Energy

THY
0.1%
UMI
99.0%

Basic Materials

THY

-

UMI

-

Communication Services

THY

-

UMI

-

Consumer Cyclical

THY

-

UMI

-

Consumer Defensive

THY

-

UMI

-

Healthcare

THY

-

UMI

-

Industrials

THY

-

UMI

-

Real Estate

THY

-

UMI

-

Technology

THY

-

UMI

-

Utilities

THY

-

UMI
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THY vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THY
THY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
THY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
THY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
THY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
THY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI
UMI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THY vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THYUMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.71

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.36

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.20

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.56

8.90

-2.34

THY vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THY Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THY and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THYUMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.71

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

1.04

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Drawdowns

THY vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THY drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, smaller than the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THY and UMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THYUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-48.08%

+39.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-7.50%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.74%

-17.08%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.56%

-20.05%

+11.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-4.76%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-6.60%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

2.70%

-2.04%

Volatility

THY vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) is 0.93%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that THY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THYUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

5.94%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

10.98%

-9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

14.04%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

19.55%

-15.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

23.20%

-18.72%

THY vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

THY has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

THY vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

THY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than UMI's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
THY
Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF
5.40%6.00%5.09%4.59%2.56%3.46%2.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
5.98%6.23%4.39%4.67%4.36%3.00%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


THY and UMI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMI has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to THY (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THY dropped -8.56% vs UMI's -48.08%.

On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 20.29% vs 1.71% for THY. On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, THY has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 20.29% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for THY.

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.98%, compared with 5.40% for THY.

THY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for THY and 0.85% for UMI.

UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THY and UMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer