THY vs. UMI
THY (Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Toews Corp., while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, THY returned 1.71%/yr vs 20.29%/yr for UMI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THY charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.
Performance
THY vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THY achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 22.52% return.
THY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
UMI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.29%
- 10Y*
- —
THY vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THY Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF | 0.45% | 4.44% | 5.38% | 4.97% | -5.62% | -0.46% | 4.04% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 22.52% | 5.11% | 42.97% | 14.60% | 20.78% | 20.97% | 26.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between THY and UMI is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between THY and UMI has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
THY vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THY
UMI
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
THY
UMI
-
Energy
THY
UMI
Basic Materials
THY
-
UMI
-
Communication Services
THY
-
UMI
-
Consumer Cyclical
THY
-
UMI
-
Consumer Defensive
THY
-
UMI
-
Healthcare
THY
-
UMI
-
Industrials
THY
-
UMI
-
Real Estate
THY
-
UMI
-
Technology
THY
-
UMI
-
Utilities
THY
-
UMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THY vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank
THY
UMI
THY vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THY | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.71 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.36 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.20 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 8.90 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THY | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.71 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 1.04 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.62 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
THY vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THY drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, smaller than the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THY and UMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THY | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -48.08% | +39.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -7.50% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.74% | -17.08% | +14.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.56% | -20.05% | +11.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -4.76% | +3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -6.60% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.70% | -2.04% |
Volatility
THY vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) is 0.93%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that THY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THY | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 5.94% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | 10.98% | -9.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97% | 14.04% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 19.55% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 23.20% | -18.72% |
THY vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
THY has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
THY vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
THY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than UMI's 5.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THY Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF | 5.40% | 6.00% | 5.09% | 4.59% | 2.56% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 5.98% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THY and UMI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMI has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to THY (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THY dropped -8.56% vs UMI's -48.08%.
On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 20.29% vs 1.71% for THY. On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, THY has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 20.29% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for THY.
UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.98%, compared with 5.40% for THY.
THY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for THY and 0.85% for UMI.
UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THY and UMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer