THRO vs. WIMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. THRO is actively managed, while WIMA is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THRO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.

Performance

THRO vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

THRO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.99%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WIMA

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THRO vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF	2.32%
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between THRO and WIMA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

THRO vs. WIMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THRO

THRO Risk / Return Rank: 49
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

WIMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THRO vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THRO	WIMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	—	—

Drawdowns

THRO vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and WIMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	THRO	WIMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.54%	-3.33%	-23.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-2.11%	-1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-0.99%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	THRO	WIMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	16.54%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	16.54%	+2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	16.54%	+2.23%

THRO vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

THRO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

THRO vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison

THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF	0.26%	0.15%	0.73%	0.55%	0.90%
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THRO and WIMA in my portfolio?

THRO and WIMA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, THRO or WIMA?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, THRO or WIMA?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for THRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THRO or WIMA?

THRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

What is the main difference between THRO and WIMA?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for THRO and 0.42% for WIMA.