THNR vs. PBPH
THNR (Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - THNR tracks the VettaFi Weight Loss Drug & Treatment Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THNR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
THNR vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNR achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's -1.70% return.
THNR
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- 9.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THNR vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THNR Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF | -5.20% | -1.35% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.70% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNR and PBPH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNR vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
THNR
PBPH
THNR vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THNR | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THNR | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.11 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
THNR vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNR drawdown since its inception was -32.51%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNR and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNR | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.51% | -11.10% | -21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.00% | -9.22% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.24% | -4.20% | -8.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | — | — |
Volatility
THNR vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNR | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.15% | 16.83% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 16.83% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 16.83% | +2.54% |
THNR vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNR vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
THNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
THNR Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF | 1.73% | 1.64% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THNR and PBPH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THNR.
THNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
THNR tracks VettaFi Weight Loss Drug & Treatment Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THNR and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for THNR and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer