PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNR vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNR achieves a -5.67% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.


THNR

1D
-0.50%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
-5.67%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
8.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
THNR
Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF
-5.67%13.65%-10.36%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between THNR and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNR
THNR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
THNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
THNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNRIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

2.24

-1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

17.27

-16.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

67.45

-65.83

THNR vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNR and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNRIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

5.05

-4.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

3.49

-3.59

Drawdowns

THNR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNR drawdown since its inception was -32.51%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNR and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNRIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.51%

-0.90%

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-0.26%

-11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.43%

-0.13%

-13.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-0.10%

-12.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

0.07%

+5.24%

Volatility

THNR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that THNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNRIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

0.33%

+4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

0.67%

+12.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

0.90%

+18.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

1.58%

+17.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

1.58%

+17.77%

THNR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

THNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
THNR
Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF
1.74%1.64%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNR has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNR dropped -32.51% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, THNR leads with 8.57% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THNR has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THNR.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.74% for THNR.

THNR is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. THNR tracks VettaFi Weight Loss Drug & Treatment Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THNR and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNR and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer