THNQ vs. PBOT
THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. THNQ is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
THNQ vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly higher than PBOT's 24.27% return.
THNQ
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 31.35%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 1Y
- 55.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.75%
PBOT
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 22.08%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.25K | $25.15K | $21.82K | |
| $1.82M | $1.71M | $2.47M |
THNQ vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 33.15% | -3.18% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 24.27% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNQ and PBOT is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNQ vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
THNQ
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THNQ vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THNQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THNQ vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -15.78% | -34.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.60% | -7.70% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -4.51% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | — | — |
Volatility
THNQ vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.08% | 26.96% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 26.96% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 26.96% | +2.01% |
THNQ vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNQ vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than PBOT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.15% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, THNQ and PBOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.
THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.08% for PBOT.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for THNQ and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer