PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THNQ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THNQ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-7.05%29.83%18.82%10.38%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
12.20%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 12.20% return.


THNQ

1D
5.60%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-7.05%
6M
-7.67%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*

CHPS

1D
5.84%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
12.20%
6M
33.13%
1Y
95.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THNQ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNQCHPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

2.55

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

3.10

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

5.39

-3.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.70

18.93

-13.23

THNQ vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and CHPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNQCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.55

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.98

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and CHPS is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

THNQ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than CHPS's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%0.00%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%1.75%0.36%

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and CHPS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-39.44%

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-17.50%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

-12.68%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-9.63%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

4.98%

+0.62%

Volatility

THNQ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is 10.92%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that THNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THNQCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.92%

13.99%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.67%

26.20%

-5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

37.67%

-7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.78%

32.80%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.58%

32.80%

-4.22%