PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNMX vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund (THNMX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNMX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than DNYMX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, THNMX has underperformed DNYMX with an annualized return of 1.16%, while DNYMX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.


THNMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.61%
6M
-0.86%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.16%
ALL TIME*
3.39%

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.08%
6M
0.78%
YTD
1.21%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
1.29%
ALL TIME*
1.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THNMX
Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund
-0.14%5.08%1.10%3.52%-6.39%0.11%3.47%4.68%1.40%2.04%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
1.21%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between THNMX and DNYMX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between THNMX and DNYMX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNMX vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THNMX
THNMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
THNMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
THNMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund (THNMX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THNMXDNYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

3.06

-1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

9.85

-8.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

41.30

-36.69

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNMX and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNMX drawdown since its inception was -9.86%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNMX and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNMXDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-3.19%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.99%

-0.24%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-0.98%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.72%

-2.53%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.86%

-3.19%

-6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-0.08%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.41%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.06%

+0.59%

Volatility

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund (THNMX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that THNMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNMXDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.18%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

0.48%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

0.65%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

0.88%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.80%

1.04%

+1.76%

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNMX vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

THNMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than DNYMX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.62%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
THNMX
Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund
2.75%3.86%3.13%1.75%1.42%1.45%1.68%2.44%2.53%2.41%2.07%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNMX and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNMX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to DNYMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNMX dropped -9.86% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNMX and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer