PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THMZ vs. AGMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THMZ vs. AGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than AGMI's 7.60% return.


THMZ

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.63%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.17%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGMI

1D
-4.74%
1M
3.77%
YTD
7.60%
6M
20.09%
1Y
112.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THMZ vs. AGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
3.26%31.76%
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
7.60%156.91%

Correlation

The correlation between THMZ and AGMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THMZ vs. AGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THMZ
THMZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
THMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
THMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THMZ vs. AGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THMZAGMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.41

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

9.21

-5.80

THMZ vs. AGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the AGMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THMZ and AGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THMZAGMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.32

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

1.56

+0.08

Drawdowns

THMZ vs. AGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum AGMI drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and AGMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THMZAGMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-33.26%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-33.26%

+17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-22.35%

+21.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-9.14%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

12.29%

-7.86%

Volatility

THMZ vs. AGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is 4.23%, while Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a volatility of 17.62%. This indicates that THMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THMZAGMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

17.62%

-13.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

40.98%

-28.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

48.95%

-33.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

44.04%

-25.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

44.04%

-25.32%

THMZ vs. AGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGMI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

THMZ vs. AGMI - Dividend Comparison

THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than AGMI's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
4.12%4.43%1.81%
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
0.41%0.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THMZ and AGMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGMI has higher volatility (17.62%) compared to THMZ (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs AGMI's -33.26%.

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 112.77% vs 15.10% for THMZ. On fees, AGMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 112.77% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for THMZ.

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.41% for THMZ.

THMZ is categorized as Global Equities, while AGMI is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.35% for AGMI.

AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THMZ and AGMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer