THMZ vs. AGMI
THMZ (Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF) and AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THMZ is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while AGMI is a Silver fund tracking the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index. THMZ is actively managed, while AGMI is passively managed. Over the past year, THMZ returned 15.10% vs 112.77% for AGMI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THMZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AGMI.
Performance
THMZ vs. AGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than AGMI's 7.60% return.
THMZ
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGMI
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 20.09%
- 1Y
- 112.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THMZ vs. AGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 3.26% | 31.76% |
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | 7.60% | 156.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between THMZ and AGMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THMZ vs. AGMI — Risk / Return Rank
THMZ
AGMI
THMZ vs. AGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THMZ | AGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 3.41 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 9.21 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THMZ | AGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.32 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 1.56 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
THMZ vs. AGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum AGMI drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and AGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THMZ | AGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -33.26% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -33.26% | +17.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -22.35% | +21.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -9.14% | +6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 12.29% | -7.86% |
Volatility
THMZ vs. AGMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is 4.23%, while Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a volatility of 17.62%. This indicates that THMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THMZ | AGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 17.62% | -13.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 40.98% | -28.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 48.95% | -33.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 44.04% | -25.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 44.04% | -25.32% |
THMZ vs. AGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGMI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
THMZ vs. AGMI - Dividend Comparison
THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than AGMI's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | 4.12% | 4.43% | 1.81% |
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 0.41% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THMZ and AGMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGMI has higher volatility (17.62%) compared to THMZ (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs AGMI's -33.26%.
On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 112.77% vs 15.10% for THMZ. On fees, AGMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 112.77% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for THMZ.
AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.41% for THMZ.
THMZ is categorized as Global Equities, while AGMI is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.35% for AGMI.
AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THMZ and AGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer