PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THIR vs. XRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THIR vs. XRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THIR vs. XRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
-3.26%25.22%3.26%
XRLX
FundX Conservative ETF
-2.74%7.85%2.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THIR achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than XRLX's -2.74% return.


THIR

1D
0.51%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
-3.26%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRLX

1D
1.97%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THIR vs. XRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THIR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLX's 1.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THIR vs. XRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THIR
THIR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLX
XRLX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THIR vs. XRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THIRXRLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

0.89

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

1.33

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.20

+1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.15

5.90

+7.25

THIR vs. XRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THIR Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the XRLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THIR and XRLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THIRXRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.89

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.08

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between THIR and XRLX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

THIR vs. XRLX - Dividend Comparison

THIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than XRLX's 2.85% yield.


TTM202520242023
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
0.36%0.35%0.29%0.00%
XRLX
FundX Conservative ETF
2.85%2.77%1.66%1.68%

Drawdowns

THIR vs. XRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THIR drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum XRLX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THIR and XRLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THIRXRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-15.33%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-8.91%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

-4.43%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-1.77%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.82%

+0.17%

Volatility

THIR vs. XRLX - Volatility Comparison

THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) at 4.18%. This indicates that THIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THIRXRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.18%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

6.47%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

11.96%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

11.18%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

11.18%

+1.66%