PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THCGX vs. TSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THCGX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than TSIIX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, THCGX has outperformed TSIIX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while TSIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


THCGX

1D
-1.87%
1M
1.45%
YTD
9.87%
6M
6.49%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
9.36%

TSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.97%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
9.87%4.31%19.67%19.56%-34.19%-4.97%41.70%28.95%-2.56%23.91%
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
0.63%7.58%4.85%7.63%-6.44%2.80%8.27%7.92%0.70%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between THCGX and TSIIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007

0.25

The correlation between THCGX and TSIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THCGX vs. TSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THCGX
THCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
THCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
THCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
THCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
THCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TSIIX
TSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THCGXTSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.29

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

7.83

-3.31

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the TSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THCGX and TSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than TSIIX's maximum drawdown of -21.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THCGX and TSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THCGXTSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-21.98%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-2.14%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.25%

-2.62%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.67%

-9.40%

-54.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.67%

-9.58%

-54.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.95%

-0.72%

-34.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.25%

-1.64%

-19.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

0.62%

+4.16%

Volatility

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) at 0.81%. This indicates that THCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THCGXTSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

0.81%

+5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

2.08%

+12.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

2.79%

+17.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.00%

3.39%

+33.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.16%

2.96%

+27.20%

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THCGX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TSIIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

THCGX vs. TSIIX - Dividend Comparison

THCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%54.25%6.23%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
4.89%4.99%5.10%4.50%3.49%4.17%3.70%3.82%3.40%3.59%3.43%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


THCGX and TSIIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THCGX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to TSIIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THCGX dropped -63.67% vs TSIIX's -21.98%.

TSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THCGX and TSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer